Worked examples apple.com

Is apple.com vibe coded?

The most expensive homepage in the world. We fetched the homepage on 29 August 2026 and ran all 86 detectors over the raw HTML — the same scan you get from the box on the front page, frozen here so the numbers can be argued with.

0/100

www.apple.com

Hand-written

Somebody sat down and made decisions. Several of them were opinions.

Vibe tells
3
Craft tells
6
Confidence
high

Plenty of signal to work with.

Where the score came from

  • Platform fingerprintsnone

    Artefacts of the tool, not of taste

  • Colour, type and surfacenone

    The visual defaults, applied unedited

  • Layout and architecturenone

    The shape a page takes when nobody asks what it needs to say

  • Copy tells1 hit

    How the words were written

  • Leftoversnone

    Scaffolding never cleaned up

  • Source and build1 hit

    What is visible in the shipped code

  • How it behaves1 hit

    Weight, mobile, accessibility, SEO — where the money leaks

  • Human craft6 hits

    Evidence of deliberate decisions

Evidence

9 findings
  • 9

    Deliberate social preview

    Open Graph title and image were both authored.

  • +8

    Dependency sprawl

    1 third-party asset hosts and 15 script files. Each sub-problem got whatever library was most popular in the training data, and nothing was ever consolidated.

    • www.apple.com.cn
  • +8

    Fixed pixel widths that will overflow a phone

    Hard pixel widths wider than a phone. Layouts break at sizes nobody prompted for, because desktop was the only viewport that got looked at.

    • width:734px
    • width:1068px
    • width: 734px
    • width: 1068px
  • 7

    Hand-written ARIA

    209 explicit accessibility attributes.

  • 7

    No utility-class soup

    Not one Tailwind utility class in the markup.

  • +6

    The rule-of-three cadence

    3 triplet lists and 0 “not just X — it's Y” constructions. Rhythm borrowed from marketing prose, with none of the content.

What we read

title
Apple
generator
server
Apple
status
200
html
248.4 KB
words
1,038
fetched in
599 ms
Open the page yourself

Reading this score

apple.com landed on 8/100, which puts it in the hand-written band. That number is not a percentage and not a probability — it is strength of evidence: 18 points of tells, damped by craft, less 39 points of deliberate decisions, mapped through one logistic curve.

What pushed it up

What pulled it down

Craft we looked for and did not find

These are the actionable half of the report. None of them are hard, and every one of them would have moved the number.

What this scan cannot see

One request, no JavaScript executed. So everything below is invisible to us, and a page can be excellent or awful at all of it without moving the score:

Scan a URL of your own →