Worked examples nytimes.com

Is nytimes.com vibe coded?

A newsroom's front page, under real constraints. We fetched the homepage on 29 August 2026 and ran all 86 detectors over the raw HTML — the same scan you get from the box on the front page, frozen here so the numbers can be argued with.

0/100

www.nytimes.com

Hand-written

Somebody sat down and made decisions. Several of them were opinions.

Vibe tells
3
Craft tells
8
Confidence
high

Plenty of signal to work with.

Where the score came from

  • Platform fingerprintsnone

    Artefacts of the tool, not of taste

  • Colour, type and surfacenone

    The visual defaults, applied unedited

  • Layout and architecture1 hit

    The shape a page takes when nobody asks what it needs to say

  • Copy tellsnone

    How the words were written

  • Leftoversnone

    Scaffolding never cleaned up

  • Source and build1 hit

    What is visible in the shipped code

  • How it behaves1 hit

    Weight, mobile, accessibility, SEO — where the money leaks

  • Human craft8 hits

    Evidence of deliberate decisions

Evidence

11 findings
  • 9

    Deliberate social preview

    Open Graph title and image were both authored.

  • 9

    Skip-to-content link

    A keyboard skip link exists. Generators do not do this.

  • +8

    Fixed pixel widths that will overflow a phone

    Hard pixel widths wider than a phone. Layouts break at sizes nobody prompted for, because desktop was the only viewport that got looked at.

    • min-width:740px
    • min-width:1024px
    • min-width:1150px
    • width:1200px
  • +7

    Everything centred

    6 centred blocks. Long centred text is measurably harder to read, and with no left-aligned anchor the hierarchy flattens.

  • 7

    Hand-written ARIA

    21 explicit accessibility attributes.

  • 7

    No utility-class soup

    Not one Tailwind utility class in the markup.

What we read

title
The New York Times - Breaking News, US News, World News and Videos
generator
server
envoy
status
200
html
893.8 KB
words
1,119
fetched in
1302 ms
Open the page yourself

Reading this score

nytimes.com landed on 4/100, which puts it in the hand-written band. That number is not a percentage and not a probability — it is strength of evidence: 16 points of tells, damped by craft, less 54 points of deliberate decisions, mapped through one logistic curve.

What pushed it up

What pulled it down

Craft we looked for and did not find

These are the actionable half of the report. None of them are hard, and every one of them would have moved the number.

What this scan cannot see

One request, no JavaScript executed. So everything below is invisible to us, and a page can be excellent or awful at all of it without moving the score:

Scan a URL of your own →